Tomas Barrios Vera vs Michael Mmoh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Apr at 08:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Barrios Vera vs M. Mmoh

CHI
1
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Vera 1 - 1 Mmoh
They have played 5 sets in total, with Tomas Barrios Vera winning 2 and Michael Mmoh winning 3. The last match between Michael Mmoh and Tomas Barrios Vera was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 14-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Michael Mmoh getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vera | 1 |
| Mmoh | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Tallahassee Challenger(04-14-25)
(R2) Sarasota Challenger(04-10-25)
T. B. Vera vs M. Mmoh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $698,115 | Career Prize Money | $1,274,430 |
| 62.98% (410-241) | Career Total W/L | 57.60% (303-223) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 14 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 22.22% (2-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (2-3) |
T. B. Vera vs M. Mmoh Match Preview:
Recent statistics indicate that Michael Mmoh and Tomas Barrios Vera have demonstrated similar performance in their second serve capabilities over the past six months. Mmoh secured 42.52% of points on his second serve, while Vera managed 43.29%. A closer look at their return game performance reveals that Mmoh has excelled, winning 49.37% of points on his opponent's second serves, compared to Vera's 46.67%. This figure can be a decisive factor when predicting match outcomes.
Regarding their ability to handle pressure, statistics show Mmoh saved 51.35% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Vera, who saved 50.5%. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Mmoh converted 38.83% of opportunities, compared to Vera's 37.9%. These facts might provide valuable insights for in-game betting enthusiasts.
Analyzing each player’s career surface performance, Mmoh has shown a strong preference for indoor hard courts with a win rate of 63%, while grass courts have proven to be less favorable at 44%. Conversely, Vera excels on clay with a winning margin of 64%, but has struggled on indoor hard surfaces. Furthermore, Vera's experience mostly stems from playing at the Challengers/ITF tournaments, where he won 69.23% of his matches in the last year, compared to Mmoh's 66.67% win rate on the Main tour.
The direct head-to-head results slightly favor Vera, who won the only previous matchup between the two players. Their encounter, which took place at the Sarasota Challenger, resulted in a 4-6, 6-3, 6-2 victory for Vera. This match lasted an average of 2 hours and 26 minutes. Given that both players have similar success rates in deciding sets, with Mmoh winning 57% and Vera 56%, a close contest is anticipated if it extends to a deciding set.
Evaluating the quality of the competition faced, Mmoh has played against slightly stronger opponents with an average rank of 163.65 compared to Vera's 246.03. Considering these statistics holistically, Vera may have a slight upper hand given his superior head-to-head record, clay court prowess, and overall match win percentage. Thus, Tomas Barrios Vera appears likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming contest, based on statistical insights.
Tomas Barrios Vera vs Michael Mmoh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. B. Vera vs M. Mmoh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 22 | Games Won | 23 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:52:28 | Average Match Time | 1:52:28 |
| 61% (90/147) | 1st Serve % | 66% (84/128) |
| 61% (55/90) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (60/84) |
| 49% (28/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (18/44) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (8/16) |
| 39% (50/128) | Return Points Win % | 44% (64/147) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. B. Vera Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
F | W | 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | ||
SF | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(2) 6-7(6) 7-6(10) | ||
M. Mmoh Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 1-6 6-4 4-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||

T. B. Vera vs M. Mmoh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.98% (410/241) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.60% (303/223) |
| 60.65% (917/595) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.82% (695/550) |
| 53.66% (7653/6608) | Games Win/Loss | 52.26% (6168/5634) |
| 60.71% (85/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.56% (190/129) |
| 64.32% (310/172) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (30/36) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.07% (72/44) |
| 60.00% (15/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.00% (11/14) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 1565 | Aces Total | 2299 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1324 | Total Double Faults | 1720 |
| 1:40:12 | Average Match Time | 1:36:31 |
| 441.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.48 |
| 63% (27717/43747) | 1st Serve % | 66% (22581/34382) |
| 68% (18728/27717) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15777/22581) |
| 51% (8132/16025) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5729/11801) |
| 44% (2151/4882) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1424/3425) |
| 42% (18679/44688) | Return Points Win % | 39% (13488/34515) |
| 51.35% (19/18) | Slam W/L | 43.64% (24/31) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Masters W/L | 26.92% (7/19) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.84% (14/23) | Main Tour W/L | 50.62% (41/40) |
| 62.47% (238/143) | Challenger W/L | 61.95% (184/113) |
| 72.93% (132/49) | Futures W/L | 70.15% (47/20) |
| 63% (402/636) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (289/482) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 60% (115/193) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (92/176) |
| 53% (109/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (90/165) |
| 87% (406/353) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (307/259) |
| 13% (406/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (307/47) |
| 23% (244/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (219/44) |